Monday, March 14, 2011

US Dept. of Justice orders lowering of test score requirements for police...

...because of diversity.  The article below is highlighted for emphasis.  I'm sure the people of Dayton will feel better, knowing that a score that won't get you out of 1st grade math, will allow you to become a police officer.  At least there may be more minority police, right?  Who failed the test by all standards except the DOJ's?  Attorney General Holder has made it clear that his priorities are about race and racial politics, rather than Justice.  Does anyone else see better relationships developing between the police and the community, and better enforcement of the law from this policy?  And a more pressing question may be why the US Department of Justice is mandating what local police department policies are?  


Read the original article here.


Dayton's News Source :: Top Stories

DAYTON -- The Dayton Police Department is lowering its testing standards for recruits.
It's a move required by the U.S. Department of Justice after it says not enough African-Americans passed the exam.  
Dayton is in desperate need of officers to replace dozens of retirees.  The hiring process was postponed for months because the D.O.J. rejected the original scores provided by the Dayton Civil Service Board, which administers the test.
Under the previous requirements, candidates had to get a 66% on part one of the exam and a 72% on part two.
The D.O.J. approved new scoring policy only requires potential police officers to get a 58% and a 63%.  That's the equivalent of an ‘F’ and a ‘D’.
 “It becomes a safety issue for the people of our community,” said Dayton Fraternal Order of Police President, Randy Beane.  “It becomes a safety issue to have an incompetent officer next to you in a life and death situation."
“The NAACP does not support individuals failing a test and then having the opportunity to be gainfully employed,” agreed Dayton NAACP President Derrick Foward.
The D.O.J. and Civil Service Board declined Dayton’s News Source’s repeat requests for interviews.  The lower standards mean 258 more people passed the test. The city won't say how many were minorities.
“If you lower the score for any group of people, you're not getting the best qualified people for the job,” Foward said.
“We need to work with the youth and make them interested in becoming law enforcement officers and firefighters,” said Beane.  “Break down the barriers whether they are real or perceived, so we can move forward in this community.”
The D.O.J. has forced other police departments across the country to lower testing standards, citing once again that not enough black candidates were passing.  
The Dayton Firefighter recruit exam is coming up this summer.  The chief said it’s likely the passing score for that test will be lowered as well.Civil Service Board Announces Police Recruit Scores

The reaction that prevents people from supporting Palestine...

...or at least, should prevent them. Read the original article here.
Gaza celebrates; Fayyad condemns terror attack
 
Rafah residents hand out candy following murder of parents, three children in West Bank settlement of Itamar. Palestinian PM denounces act, says "we categorically oppose violence and terror, regardless of victims', perpetrators' identity"

Elior Levy
Gaza residents from the southern city of Rafah hit the streets Saturday to celebrate the terror attack in the West Bank settlement of Itamar where five family members were murdered in their sleep, including three children.
Residents handed out candy and sweets, one resident saying the joy "is a natural response to the harm settlers inflict on the Palestinian residents in the West Bank."

Full story[1]
Meanwhile, Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad said he "clearly and firmly denounces the terror attack, just as I have denounced crimes against Palestinians.
"We are against all types of violence," Fayyad said during a tour in Bethlehem. "Our position has not changed. As we have said many times before, we categorically oppose violence and terror, regardless of the identity of the victims or the perpetrators."
IDF and security forces have been scouring the West Bank area since late Friday night, and have arrested 20 Palestinians from the villages of Awarta, Zababdeh, Sanur and Siliya. The IAF employed unmanned aerial vehicle in an effort to search for the suspects.
The Hamas[2] movement accused the Palestinian Authority's security apparatus of arresting three of its activists near Qalqilya and Jenin.
"The report of five murdered Israelis is not enough to punish someone," said Hamas Spokesperson Sami Abu Zuhri, adding, "However; we in Hamas completely support the resistance against settlers who murder and use crime and terror against the Palestinian people under the auspices of the Israeli occupation soldiers."
 
A pamphlet distributed by the Islamic group said the PA also detained activists from Nablus, who were previously imprisoned and released. According to an unverified report, Fatah's military wing – the al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades [3]– claimed responsibility for the attack. A group spokesman told a Palestinian news agency that a terror cell infiltrated the settlement of Itamar and committed the attack.
The spokesperson stressed that the attack "came as a response to Israel's continues hostile policy toward the Palestinian people."
Defense Minister Ehud Barak[4] convened an evaluation session at the Defense Ministry offices in Tel Aviv following the attack. The meeting was attended by IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz and other military and intelligence officials.
Barak called on the leaders of Jewish settlements in the West Bank to act responsibly and urged the Palestinian leadership to denounce the attack. Ron Nachman, mayor of the city of Ariel, arrived in Itamar Saturday noon and expressed anger over the government and defense minister's conduct. "We need to find those behind the attack and give them the death penalty. I can't recall such a horrific terror attack," he said. Nachman refused to comment on future "price tag" operations of radical rightist, saying: "I am not responsible for violent acts from either side." Yoav Zitun and Attila Somfalvi contributed to this report 

References
Full story (www.ynetnews.com)

^ Hamas (www.ynetnews.com)
^ al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades (www.ynetnews.com)
^ Ehud Barak (www.ynetnews.com)

Iran does whatever it wants...

Read the original article here.


Iran 'using child soldiers' to suppress Tehran protests | World news

Iran[1]'s Islamic regime is using "child soldiers" to suppress anti-government demonstrations, a tactic that could breach international law forbidding the use of underage combatants, human rights activists have told the Observer.
The International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran says troops aged between 14 and 16 have been armed with batons, clubs and air guns and ordered to attack demonstrators who have tried to gather in Tehran. The youths – apparently recruited from rural areas – are being deployed in regular riot police roles and comprise up to one-third of the total force, according to witnesses.
One middle-aged woman, who said she was attacked by the youths, reported that some were as young as 12 and were possibly prepubescent. They had rural accents, which indicated they had been brought in from villages far from Tehran, she said.
Some told her they had been attracted by the promise of chelo kebab dinners, one of Iran's national dishes.
"It's really a violation of international law. It's no different than child soldiers, which is the custom in many zones of conflict," said Hadi Ghaemi, the campaign's executive director. "They are being recruited into being part of the conflict and armed for it."
The UN convention on the rights of the child requires states to take "all feasible measures to ensure that persons who have not attained the age of 15 years do not take a direct part in hostilities".
The allegation comes amid efforts by Iran's opposition Green movement to revive the mass protests that challenged President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad[2]'s re-election in 2009, which opponents say was rigged. Drawing encouragement from the uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia, organisers have vowed to stage demonstrations every Tuesday.
Protesters who gathered on 1 March and a week later were met by a blanket security presence, which activists say refined the tactics used to crush the post-election revolt, when smaller detachments of youths were used informally by the hardline Basij militia.
Last Tuesday youthful riot squads formed along Valiasr Street, Tehran's central thoroughfare, and forced pedestrians to run an intimidating gauntlet. Protesters chanting anti-government slogans were attacked. Multiple arrests were reported.
"They are very keen to display violence. Teenage boys are notorious for that," said Ghaemi. "They are being used to ensure there is a good ratio of government forces to protesters and because the average policeman in Tehran could have some kind of family connection to the people they have to beat up. It's a classic tactic to bring people from outside, because they have no sense of sympathy for city dwellers."
The renewed clampdown coincides with concern over the whereabouts of the Green movement's nominal leaders, Mir Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi. Both were apparently placed under house arrest last month and then reported to have been taken into detention, despite official denials.
Robert Tait is a senior correspondent for RFE/RL and a former Tehran correspondent for the Observer.

References

  1. ^ More from guardian.co.uk on Iran (www.guardian.co.uk)
  2. ^ More from guardian.co.uk on Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (www.guardian.co.uk)

State Dept. Spokesman resigns after making statements...

Read the original article here.

P.J. Crowley resigns over Manning remark - Mike Allen and Josh Gerstein

State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley has resigned after publicly crossing swords with the Pentagon[1] over the treatment of an Army soldier accused of leaking hundreds of thousands of classified military reports and sensitive diplomatic cables to WikiLeaks.

The chain of events that led to Crowley’s exit was set in motion Thursday when Crowley appeared at a Massachusetts Institute of Technology seminar and called the Pentagon’s handling of Pfc. Bradley Manning[2], who is detained at the brig at Quantico, “ridiculous and counterproductive and stupid.[3]Continue Reading[4]

Crowley’s public criticism angered some at the Pentagon and others across the administration because it put him directly at odds with Defense Department officials who have spent weeks trying to defend Manning’s treatment. The soldier is being detained under near-constant lockdown, and he filed a formal complaint about being forced to strip each night at bedtime.

The State spokesman’s predicament may have worsened further Friday afternoon, when ABC’s Jake Tapper asked[5] Obama during a White House press conference whether he agreed with Crowley.

“With respect to Private Manning, I have actually asked the Pentagon whether or not the procedures that have been taken in terms of his confinement are appropriate and are meeting our basic standards. They assure me that they are,” Obama said. “I can’t go into details about some of their concerns, but some of this has to do with Private Manning’s safety as well.”

When Tapper pressed the president further, Obama replied tersely, “I think I gave you an answer to the substantive issue.”

Obama never said explicitly whether he agreed with the military’s handling of Manning. White House press secretary Jay Carney[6] declined to elaborate on the president’s remarks.

In a statement Sunday, Crowley, notably made no apology for his remarks, but acknowledged that they made his continued service untenable.

“The unauthorized disclosure of classified information is a serious crime under U.S. law. My recent comments regarding the conditions of the pre-trial detention of Private First Class Bradley Manning were intended to highlight the broader, even strategic impact of discreet actions undertaken by national security agencies every day and their impact on our global standing and leadership. The exercise of power in today’s challenging times and relentless media environment must be prudent and consistent with our laws and values,” Crowley said.

“Given the impact of my remarks, for which I take full responsibility, I have submitted my resignation as Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs and Spokesman for the Department of State,” Crowley said.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton[7] said in a statement that she accepted Crowley’s resignation “with regret.”Continue Reading[8]

His service, she wrote, “is motivated by a deep devotion to public policy and public diplomacy, and I wish him the very best.”

According to administration officials, Crowley had been on the outs with Clinton, and rarely accompanied her on her travels abroad. Michael Hammer, President Barack Obama’s NSC spokesman, had been sent to State earlier this year, and some officials expected him to succeed Crowley, those sources said.

However, other officials offered a somewhat conflicting version of events, saying that Crowley asked for Hammer as a deputy. The two men worked closely together at the NSC when both were spokesmen there during the Clinton Administration. One source denied any rift between Clinton and Crowley, saying the decision for him not to travel was made largely so Crowley could better oversee State’s large public affairs staff.

Crowley made his remarks about Manning in response to a question at an MIT new media roundtable Thursday in Cambridge, Mass.

“I spent 26 years in the Air Force,” Crowley, a retired colonel, said, according to blog posts by two of those present at the MIT discussion. “What is happening to Manning is ridiculous, counterproductive and stupid, and I don’t know why the DoD is doing it. Nevertheless, Manning is in the right place” in detention.

Manning has formally complained that guards at the brig have harassed him and that commanders there have punished him since he was placed in custody in July.

Manning, 25, faces a possible court-martial for leaking vast troves of classified information. The Army recently upgraded the preliminary charges against him to include aiding the enemy. That can be punishable by death, though Army prosecutors said they did not plan to seek capital punishment in Manning’s case.

Earlier this month, guards began demanding that he strip off all his clothes at night. Defense officials have suggested that the measure was needed to keep Manning from attempting suicide. But Manning’s official complaint notes that Navy psychiatrists who have examined him don’t believe he’s a suicide risk.

Journalist Philippa Thomas and Internet researcher Ethan Zuckerman, who both were at the MIT discussion conference, reported Crowley’s comments.

Thomas said she later asked Crowley if his remarks were on the record. She said he had a one-word reply: “‘Sure.’”

“What I said was my personal opinion. It does not reflect an official [U.S. government] policy position,” Crowley told Foreign Policy magazine on Friday. “I defer to the Department of Defense regarding the treatment of Bradley Manning.”Continue Reading[9]

“We are aware of Mr. Crowley’s remarks and have since sent him the facts on PFC Manning’s pre-trial confinement,” a Pentagon spokesman, Army Col. Dave Lapan, said Saturday.

On Thursday, Manning’s defense lawyer released his client’s latest complaint about his treatment, an 11-page memo that claimed he’s being improperly held on a “prevention of injury” status and required to hand over his clothes to guards each night. The complaint said he was recently given a “smock” to wear at night.

“The determination to strip me of my clothing every night since 2 March 2011 is without justification and therefore constitutes unlawful pretrial punishment,” Manning wrote. He said Navy psychiatrists have repeatedly recommended lifting the prevention of injury restrictions but brig commanders have declined.

The order for Manning to strip at night apparently followed what he described as a sarcastic comment he made to guards — that if he were intent on strangling himself, he could use his underwear or flip-flops.

“As the result of concerns for PFC Manning’s personal safety, his undergarments were taken from him during sleeping hours,” Lapan confirmed. “PFC Manning at all times had a bed and a blanket to cover himself. He was not made to stand naked for morning count but, but on one day, he chose to do so. There were no female personnel present at the time. PFC Manning has since been issued a garment to sleep in at night.”

There were immediate signs Sunday that, as a result of his firing, Crowley was becoming a kind of cult hero for the left.

Jane Hamsher, writing on the liberal Firedoglake website, branded Crowley’s abrupt departure as Obama’s “Saturday Night Massacre” — a reference to the resignation of Attorney General Eliot Richardson and his deputy after they refused to carry out President Richard Nixon’s order to fire Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox.

In recent months, Crowley had been a key spokesperson for the administration on the WikiLeaks issue, sometimes offering harsh assessments of Manning’s alleged conduct.

“Someone inside the United States government violated the trust and confidence placed in him. He downloaded material and passed it to people not authorized to have it. That is a crime. We’re investigating that crime and we’re going to prosecute those responsible,” Crowley told CNN in December.

References

  1. ^ Pentagon (topics.politico.com)
  2. ^ Bradley Manning (topics.politico.com)
  3. ^ ridiculous and counterproductive and stupid. (www.politico.com)
  4. ^  (www.politico.com)
  5. ^ ABC’s Jake Tapper asked (www.politico.com)
  6. ^ Jay Carney (topics.politico.com)
  7. ^ Hillary Clinton (topics.politico.com)
  8. ^  (www.politico.com)
  9. ^  (www.politico.com)


Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51197.html#ixzz1GZwC3hTs

Friday, March 11, 2011

Corporal Tasker Killed By Sniper and His Bomb Sniffing Dog Collapsed and Died

There is a verse of the poem "The Fallen," written in 1914 by Robert Laurence Binyon at the start of WWI, that is quoted during memorial services for soldiers in the UK: "When you go home, tell them of us and say, for their tomorrow, we gave our today."  Fitting for both these fallen heroes.

Read the original story here.

British mourners traditionally give a respectful silent salute to slain soldiers, but today they were joined by dog owners who brought their dogs to the grim arrival of Lance Corporal Liam Tasker and his bomb sniffing dog Theo.

Tasker, 26, died in a firefight on March 1 in Helmand province with Theo by his side. The dog, a springer spaniel, suffered a seizure from the stress and died hours later after being returned to base, according to the British Ministry of Defense. 

Tasker's body and the ashes of Theo were returned today on the same military plane to RAF Lyneham in Wiltshire, England. 

Residents of Wootton Bassett, near Lyneham, lined the streets when Tasker's coffin, draped with the British Union Jack, passed through the town on its way to Oxford, where soldiers' bodies are examined by a coroner before being returned to families. 

Villagers traditionally greet the casket with a solemn moment of silence. It's a ritual of respect that began more than two years ago, explained a local government employee. 

"It just happened," she said, beginning initially with veterans who would gather around the town's war memorial when a coffin passed. "They raised their caps…that's how it all started," she said. 

But when the bells of St. Bartholomew's Church tolled today, the mourners included devastated dog handlers and their animals, she said. 

Tasker and Theo had worked together uncovering roadside bombs in Afghanistan and were remarkably successful, finding 14 bombs meant to kill and maim British soldiers. 

They had more operational finds than any other individual team in Afghanistan to date, the Ministry of Defense said. They were featured in a video released by the Army before Tasker's death, showing a perky Theo on patrol with his handler. 

The two were so good at what they were doing that their tour of duty had been extended by a month. 

Theo, 22 months old and on his first tour of duty, was with Tasker when he was felled by a sniper's bullet during a firefight and died. 

"I truly believe when Theo went back to the kennel, that that would have a big, big impact because Liam wasn't there to comfort him," Tasker's father, Ian Tasker, told ITV news. 

Tasker's mother, Jane Duffy, said: "I would like to believe he died of a broken heart to be with Liam." 

Theo's ashes were due to be presented to the Tasker family today in a private ceremony. 

Tasker, from Kirkcaldy, Scotland was the 358th member of the British military to have died in Afghanistan since operations began in 2001. 

He served in the Royal Army Veterinary Corps and had been deployed last September after having trained as an arms and explosives search-dog handler. He was a mechanic when he first joined the Army, according to a Ministry of Defense statement, but his passion for dogs led to his transfer to the Veterinary Corps in 2007.
Lance Corporal Natasha Mooney from the Veterinary Corps called Tasker "a larger than life character" and said, "Theo truly was man's best friend and they rest in peace together." 

Pamela Reid, vice-president of the ASPCA's Animal Behavior Center, said Tasker and Theo had clearly developed a powerful bond. 

"The stress in being separated from the handler could be a very serious component in what happened," she said. "It speaks to the intense relationship we can have with animals." 

Theo is the sixth British military dog killed in action in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2001.

Quote of the Day

Did he not realize what job he was running for?  I'm sure Joe Biden would be happy to take over if Mr. Obama is in over his head....hrmm.....I wonder why he would feel like it's too much?


Read the original article here.



President of China? | The Weekly Standard

“Mr. Obama has told people that it would be so much easier to be the president of China. As one official put it, ‘No one is scrutinizing Hu Jintao’s words in Tahrir Square.’”
Obama Seeks a Course of Pragmatism in the Middle East[1],” The New York Times, March 11, 2011.
Mr. Obama is right.
If you’re president of China, people around the world who are fighting for freedom don’t really expect you to help. If you’re president of China, you don’t have to put up with annoying off-year congressional elections, and then negotiate your budget with a bunch of gun-and-religion-clinging congressmen and senators. If you’re president of China, you can fund your national public radio to your heart’s content. And if you’re president of China, when you host a conference on bullying in schools, people take you seriously.
Unfortunately for him and us, Barack Obama is president of the United States. That job brings with it certain special responsibilities. It’s a tough job—maybe tougher than being president of China. But Barack Obama ran for president of the United States. Maybe he should start acting as one.
§

Who's the leader of the Free World now?

Money quote: “We thank the French government and the people of Libya will never forget that they (the French government) were the first country to recognize us and they stood with us in our difficult time.”  
Imane Boughaighis, media organizer for Libya’s Interim Transitional National Council

Read the original article here.

Rebel Benghazi to get ambassador

France became the first country to formally recognize the Libyan opposition – the Interim Transitional National Council – as legitimate representatives of the Libyan people on Thursday, pledging to exchange ambassadors with the country’s newly created transitional council in a major diplomatic victory for the Libyan opposition.
The announcement followed a meeting between French President Nicolas Sarkozy and two representatives of Libya’s Interim Transitional National Council[1] in Paris Thursday
Speaking to reporters at the Elysée presidential palace in Paris, Ali al Issawi, a former Libyan ambassador to India who quit his post last month, announced that, “France recognises the National Council as the legitimate representative of the Libyan people.
"There will be an exchange of ambassadors between Paris and Benghazi," he added, referring to the eastern Libyan city that has emerged as a rebel stronghold over the past few weeks.
The recognition comes as European Union foreign ministers meet in Brussels Thursday and defense ministers of NATO’s 28 member states also gathered in the Belgian capital to consider the imposition of a no-fly zone[2]over Libya.
Ahead of the Brussels meeting, AFP reported that Sarkozy would propose “targeted airstrikes” in Libya as a way to end the violence.
Reacting to the news of France’s diplomatic recognition, Imane Boughaighis, media organizer for Libya’s Interim Transitional National Council, said the Libyan people were “very grateful” to the French government.
“We thank the French government and the people of Libya will never forget that they (the French government) were the first country to recognize us and they stood with us in our difficult time.”
In Benghazi, people gathered near the National Council's headquarters, honking cars and cheering as some fired celebratory gunshot rounds, according to Reuters.

France’s recognition of Libya’s interim Transitional National Council (TNC) has taken other EU countries by surprise.
One unnamed diplomat said: "Should we engage with the TNC? Yes. But to recognise them straightaway, that is something we cannot do. We are surprised at France's declaration."
German Foreign Affairs Secretary Werner Hoyer said the situation in Libya “remained too confused to decide how we should proceed”, even if Gaddafi’s government has been discredited.
In response to a French call for targeted airstrikes, Germany’s Foreign Minister Guido Westewelle added: “We do not want to get embroiled in a North African War”.

In a phone interview with FRANCE 24 from Benghazi, Boughaighis said she hoped France’s formal recognition of the opposition would trigger a domino effect across Europe.
Diplomatic dominoes or diplomatic tit-for-tat?
In a sign of a likely diplomatic tit-for-tat between Paris and Tripoli, the official Libyan news agency Jana quoted an unnamed foreign ministry official as saying Libya “will think about severing its relations with France because of information being circulated about France's damaging intervention in Libya's internal affairs.”
When asked whether Italy would follow France’s example, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi said his government would seek the opinion of other European countries before deciding whether to recognise Libyan rebels as the country's legitimate representatives.
"That's a decision by a single government," Berlusconi told a news conference Thursday. "I think it's better for us to listen to the stance of the entire European community."
The Italian foreign minister, Franco Frattini, underlined the point by saying that that Italy "will not participate in air strikes on Libyan territory”.
Italy, Libya’s former colonial power, is Tripoli’s main European trading partner, importing about 25 percent of its oil and 12 percent of its gas from the North African nation.
Hours after the announcement at the Elysée presidential palace, a British Foreign Office spokesman said members of the Interim Transitional National Council were "valid interlocutors with whom we wish to work closely".
Gaddafi in the image race
As the search for a coordinated international response to the Libyan conflict has gained momentum, embattled Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi has also sent envoys to a number of European countries, according to numerous reports.
On Wednesday, the Portuguese foreign ministry confirmed that Foreign Minister Luis Amado had “an informal meeting in a Lisbon hotel with a Libyan emissary, on the request of the latter”. No further details of the meeting were revealed.
Portugal chairs the UN Security Council's committee on sanctions for Libya starting this week.
Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini has also confirmed that Gaddafi’s regime "is moving towards contact" with the international community after a senior Gaddafi aide arrived in Cairo Wednesday.

References

  1. ^ Interim Transitional National Council (ntclibya.org)
  2. ^ no-fly zone (www.france24.com)

Education in Detroit: Two Sides

What do you think?

Read the original stories here and here.


Rochelle Riley: Educator Michelle Rhee tells legislators: Teacher tenure hurts children

LANSING -- Michelle Rhee brought her campaign to improve teaching to Michigan Wednesday, and she didn't mince words.

"Most teachers are granted tenure within just a few years," she told a joint meeting of Senate and House education and appropriations committee members. "Once a teacher has tenure, in most states, that teacher essentially has a job for life, regardless of performance.

"It should be virtually impossible for an ineffective teacher to remain in the classroom," she said.

Rhee, former chancellor of the Washington, D.C., public schools, founded StudentsFirst, an advocacy organization to protect children's needs the way labor groups protect educators. She is touring states to discuss ways to improve teacher performance, and to recruit 1 million members and raise $1 billion for her cause.

Rhee urged Michigan legislators to end the "outdated and bureaucratic practice known as 'last in, first out' ... a policy that hurts children."

"Even after just one year, an ineffective educator can set a child behind for years to come," she said. "This also puts a greater burden on subsequent teachers who are working so hard to catch that student up. ... I understand that proposing to eliminate tenure outright is incredibly difficult politically."

But she suggested ways, such as requiring principals to consent before minimally effective teachers are moved into their buildings, and instituting rigorous evaluation systems based partly on third-party observation in the classroom.

Michigan legislators already are considering numerous bills to end teacher tenure.

Sen. Phil Pavlov, R-St. Clair, who chairs the Senate Education Committee, said that Michigan must change how it measures teacher and student achievement.

"To suggest that a 30% proficiency rate should be a passing grade for our students today is off-base," said Pavlov, who also lavished praise on the Detroit School of the Arts, which he toured last week. But he said he is concerned about how the dismal state of Detroit's schools will affect the good teachers and students in the district.

Even Rhee's critics -- and she had some on the committees -- can't dispute some facts: When she became chancellor of the Washington public schools, only 8% of students were performing at grade level. Yet 95% of the system's teachers were rated as doing a good job.

"When the sole function of a school system is to educate children," Rhee said, "how can you have a system in which the vast majority of adults are running around thinking they are doing great work while simultaneously producing such dismal results for students?"

In an interview before the legislative hearing, Rhee said that in the next 20 years, America will need employees for an estimated 123 million high-paying, highly skilled jobs, but American students will be prepared to fill only 50 million of them.

"Close to 75 million jobs will have to be outsourced to India and China," Rhee said.

The sad thing, she said, is that business leaders nationwide know there is a problem.

"They know you can't fire people by seniority. You've got to do it by value," she said. "They know this ... and they have refused in many cases ... to be out in front of these issues because they say, 'Oh, we don't want the teachers unions to boycott our company.' "


Rochelle Riley: The fix for American schools is change

OK. I've spent two days writing about student advocate Michelle Rhee's efforts to rid American schools of bad teachers and to focus America on protecting children's educational needs.

But now let's look at what Paul Harvey used to call "the rest of the story."

I called Keith Johnson, one of the fairest presidents ever of the Detroit Federation of Teachers, and asked him: What do unions do for children?

And he hasn't stopped answering since:

"What we try to do is create the best learning and teaching environment for children and teachers, making sure that where children go to school and the conditions under which they go to school are conducive to learning," he said.

"Protecting bad teachers is the least of what we do. And we don't protect them. We just protect their right to due process."

The voices shouting solutions to the problem of America's public schools get louder and louder. Everyone knows what went wrong.

An idea: Birth system anew
"The real challenge is reinvention of an educational system dismantled by the innovative forces of technological change and the unruly winds of globalization," wrote former Detroit teacher Lorraine Rudolph in a treatise she sent to the Free Press.

"Designed to prepare the majority of students for an industrial economy, schools, especially Michigan high schools, taught an overt curriculum of basic skills and a covert curriculum of rote memorization, physical quietude, punctuality, and obedience," she said. "A factory-based model of education prepared the masses for a pot of gold at the end of the high school rainbow: a life made prosperous by taking orders from management in a plant, or through repetitive tasks in an office."

Preach, Ms. Rudolph!

She contends that the only way to save America's public schools is to "give birth, much like during the era of Reconstruction, to a new educational and economic civilization."

Or, we could heed what billionaire Warren Buffett told Michelle Rhee: The only way to fix public education, he said, is to outlaw private education.

The law requires that children attend school. So require them to attend public schools. Imagine public schools having the attention of every CEO, millionaire, politician and principal. I told you the only problem America has ever had is segregation.

Remember how Vietnam was a gnat that most of America ignored until the Defense Department needed more troops and started drafting more than poor black and white boys from the South?

Then the antiwar effort really kicked in.

Teachers' voices getting lost
In the battle to improve America's schools, the voices getting heard the least are those of the best teachers on the planet.

For me, it was science teacher Ronnie Daughtry and advanced English teacher Viola Babcock and social studies teacher Archie Moseley, who taught not just social studies, but taught us to love and understand how the world worked. And there was Harry Amana, my news-writing instructor who became my lifelong friend.
None of them taught because they couldn't be scientists or writers or journalists. They taught because they loved it -- and they were good at it.

Thinking of them made it easy to see Johnson's point that teachers who fight for small classes and clean, safe buildings are fighting for children, too.

"If a child goes into a school that is filthy and infested with vermin, you're telling that child that they are less-than," Johnson said.

And that is why every teacher I've ever known has bought more paper towels and cleanser than I have in my lifetime.

All that said, Johnson is clear: Tenure does not grant every teacher a lifetime job.

"It is as not as clear as Michelle Rhee wants to paint the picture," Johnson said. "We are a union of professionals, and we don't want people in our profession who aren't good at it. We want teachers to be evaluated fairly. We want administrators to do their due diligence."

Johnson does agree with Rhee and most education advocates -- and with me -- on two things: The children must come first and, besides Papa, education needs a brand new bag.

An Internet Sales Tax?

Read the original article here.



Illinois Governor Signs Amazon Internet Sales Tax Law - Janet Novack - Taxing Matters


After two-months of fence-sitting, Illinois Governor Pat Quinn today signed controversial legislation requiring Internet retailers like Amazon.com[1] andOverstock.com[2] to collect Illinois’ 6.25% sales tax if they have affiliate sellers in the state. House Bill 3659, the Mainstreet Fairness Bill, was passed by the state’s lame duck legislature in early January[3]. Since then, the bill has been the subject of fierce lobbying by traditional bricks and mortar retailers, who supported it, and Illinois-based Internet-only businesses, who warned that if Quinn didn’t veto it some of them would flee the state. Had Quinn done nothing, the bill would have become law tomorrow without his signature.
Amazon has already said it will terminate its Illinois affiliates, just as it has said it will drop 10,000 California based “associates” if similar legislation pending in that state becomes law. Affiliates are paid a fee by Amazon and other retailers for sales brought in through advertisements and links on the affiliates’ web sites. In an escalating PR war, Wal-Mart[4]Sears[5]Best Buy[6] and Barnes & Noble[7] have all issued public invitations to Amazon’s spurned associates to join their affiliate marketing programs instead. Yesterday, the Alliance for Main Street Fairness, a bricks and mortar retailers organization, even announced a new web site [8] to connect affiliates “about to get thrown under the bus” by online-only sellers  with retailers who already collect sales taxes on line.  Quinn’s office said today that the affiliate matchmaking service had been launched at his request.
In a statement, Scott Kluth, founder and CEO of Chicago-based CouponCabin.com called the Governor’s approval of the bill “deeply disappointing” and said he is “actively exploring” moving his seven year-old business to Indiana. Kluth, a long time resident of Chicago, had previously threatened such a move, telling Forbes[9], “I can see Indiana form the roof of our business.”
But Quinn, a Democrat, described the law as necessary to put the state’s “main street businesses” on “a level playing field” with online retailers and to protect main street jobs. In a statement issued by Quinn’s office, David Vite, president of the Illinois Retail Merchants Association  praised the law as a matter of “fairness for retailers, fairness for the economy but most importantly, fairness for taxpayers.”
Under a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, only sellers with a physical presence (“nexus” in taxspeak) in a state are required to collect that state’s sales taxes. Just shipping into a state by say, FedEx[10] or UPS[11], isn’t enough to establish nexus. Consumers buying online still owe “use” (meaning sales) tax to their states, but few bother to pay. The Illinois Department of Revenue figures it loses between $153 million and $170 million in revenue a year from Internet sales on which taxes are due, but not collected.
The new Illinois law is modeled on one adopted by New York in 2008. While Amazon has been challenging (so far unsuccessfully) the constitutionality of that law in court, it has kept its New York affiliates and now collects New York sales tax on purchases shipped to the Empire State. (It also collects for shipments to its home state of Washington, as well as North Dakota, Kansas, and Kentucky.) After Rhode Island and North Carolina adopted copycat “Amazon” laws in 2009, Amazon ended its marketing deals with sites based in those states. It also jettisoned affiliates based in Colorado, which adopted a law requiring Internet sellers who don’t collect sales tax to report sales to the state. (A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction blocking the Colorado law.) In addition to California, the states of Arizona, Connecticut, Hawaii, Minnesota, Mississippi, and Vermont are all now considering Amazon laws.
As Forbes suggested here[12], Amazon’s days of sales tax collection free selling may be numbered for another reason: Amazon’s growing network of warehouse and fulfillment centers. Last year, the Texas Comptroller sent Amazon a bill for $269 million for four years of back sales taxes, based on an Amazon warehouse there. Amazon insists the warehouse doesn’t give it nexus. But last Month, it told its Texas employees that it wouldclose the warehouse, throwing 110 of them out of work[13].
Thursday 10 P.M.  update: According to Amazon spokeswoman  Mary Osako, the retailer has now sent an e-mail to its thousands of Illinois associates stating Quinn’s signing of the law  “compels” it to terminate them.  The message reads in part:
“We had opposed this new tax law because it is unconstitutional and counterproductive. It was supported by national retailing chains, most of which are based outside Illinois, that seek to harm the affiliate advertising programs of their competitors. Similar legislation in other states has led to job and income losses, and little, if any, new tax revenue. We deeply regret that its enactment forces this action.
As a result of the new law, contracts with all Illinois affiliates of the Amazon Associates Program will be terminated and those Illinois residents will no longer receive advertising fees for sales referred to Amazon.com, Endless.com, or SmallParts.com. Please be assured that all qualifying advertising fees earned prior to April 15, 2011 will be processed and paid in full in accordance with the regular payment schedule.”
Amazon’s e-mail also invites the Illinois associates to apply for reinstatement should they relocate from the state.
Follow Janet Novack on Twitter[14]

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Quote of the Day

I'm sure Steve Jobs would love that.  If Jesse Jackson got his way, I'm buying Apple Stock.  As of Census 2000, there were 54,500,000 children enrolled in K through 12 schools.  Even if the Federal government bought Dell laptops, the ipods (at base price $229 each) would be worth $12,480,500,000.  I'd say that should help stock prices....


The original statement from Rep. Jackson below...
__________________________________________________

Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-IL) 3/2/2011, statement in the US House of Representatives


Mr. Speaker, I believe that the answer to long term unemployment is actually in the Constitution of the United States.  Well, let me say that a little differently. It's not in the Constitution of the United States. It should be in the Constitution of the United States and one of these days we are going to get there... We need to add to the Constitution the right to a family to have a decent home. What would that do for home construction, in this nation? What would that do for millions of unemployed people? He says (ed: not sure who "he" is, Jackson is reading from a newspaper) we need to add to the Constitution the right to medical care. How many doctors would such a right, create? He says we need to add to the Constitution of the United States the right to a decent education for every American. How many schools, would such a right, build? From Maine to California. How many people would be put to work building roofs and designing classrooms and providing every student with an ipod and a laptop? How many ghettos and barrios be touched by such an amendment? In fact, very little that we pass in the Congress of the United States even touches the long term unemployed. Only thing that touches them, that this Congress has access to, that can actually change their station in life is the Constitution of the United States... Mr. Speaker, there is an even greater America that's in front of us.  It's the America that adds to our founding documents these basic rights.




Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Rolling Stone "Shocker" de-bunked

Anyone remember this?  Oh wait, turns out it was bunk.  Way to be objective as always Rolling Stone.


Read the original article from wired.com here:



Spinning Senators Wasn’t a ‘Psyop,’ Officer Admits | Danger Room

The “information operations” officer at the center of an explosive Rolling Stone story about an allegedly-illicit propaganda operation will meet on Wednesday morning with an official inquiry to determine if his old boss, the general in charge of training Afghan troops, broke the law.
Only the officer, Lt. Col. Michael Holmes, concedes that Lt. Gen. Caldwell’s effort was little more than spinning legislators[1] — something any press flack could have done innocuously. Holmes’ main message to the inquiry will actually be more meta: he’s a whistleblower, subject to retaliation from Caldwell’s staff after he expressed doubt that an info-ops guy like him should be spinning U.S. citizens.
Caldwell’s command “was all about intimidation and reprisal, making people toe the line,” Holmes tells Danger Room at a Washington D.C. coffee shop. At the Pentagon at 10 a.m., he’ll pass that on to Lt. Gen. William Webster, whom Gen. David Petraeus appointed to investigate Caldwell after the Rolling Stone story[2] broke.
And all that raises questions about precisely what Caldwell is supposed to have done wrong. (Full disclosure: Both Michael Hastings, the author of theRolling Stone piece, and Caldwell are longtime friends of this blog.) After the story broke, the Internet was filled with breathless allegations about Caldwell’s “psyop,” making it seem like his staff used Jedi mind tricks to convince senators that the Afghan training mission is going swimmingly. But even Holmes says that’s overblown.
From November 2009 to September 2010, Holmes worked in the strategic communications wing of the training mission, doing nothing “psyop-y,” as he puts it: his main responsibilities were training the Afghan ministries of Defense and Interior to tell positive stories about their troops. That included sponsoring a Dari history book portraying the Afghan National Army as part of a grand national martial tradition; and even putting on a morale concert for new recruits.
He was also asked to contribute to briefings for visiting U.S. dignitaries, like senators and congressmen, who came to Kabul’s Camp Eggers to observe the training mission and talk to Caldwell. Initially, that meant “just a Google search” on their bios, personalities, and voting records, he says. “That’s not illegal… At that point, I wasn’t asked, ‘Hey, what is it we’ve got to tell them to get our message across?’ I wasn’t asked to put a spin on it.”
And that’s the extent of what Holmes says Caldwell did wrong: “putting a spin” on what to tell legislators about the training. In January 2010, Col. Gregory Breazile, the new head of Caldwell’s strategic communications shop, asked Holmes, “OK, what is it we have to tell them? What are the quote-unquote, themes and messages that we need to tell these people to accomplish our goals, to achieve the effects we want to achieve,” Holmes says. “That’s where things start crossing the line.”
Except that even in Holmes’ telling, there was no inherent line crossed. Holmes feared that his training as an information operations officer disqualified him from spinning U.S. legislators, since information operations aren’t supposed to target U.S. citizens. But both Holmes and Caldwell’s team have told Danger Room that the training command didn’t actually perform information operations[3] — like attacking enemy computer networks, psychological warfare, or military deception. Indeed, while Holmes’ September 2010 officer evaluation report refers to Holmes as an “Information Operations Supervisor,” it noted, “there is not an operational requirement for Information Operations” in the training command.
The spin itself, Holmes says, was unproblematic. “There were about 22, 24 public affairs people there on the ground at the time that were more than capable of doing this, of doing press analysis, being able to tell, ‘This is what’s happening on the ground,’” Holmes says. If those “more qualified” flacks had spun the legislators, no problem.
But Caldwell’s staff didn’t find it credible that Holmes’ information operations training disqualified him from a communications effort. The command’s judge advocate general, Capt. John Scott, agreed with Holmes that it was problematic for him to be involved in the spin. But in March, a different attorney in the command, Maj. Tami Miller, found that Holmes had been given “a lawful order[4].”
The command, however, suddenly began investigating Holmes’ own behavior that spring. And it chided Holmes for improper use of Facebook, walking around Kabul out of uniform and for an unprofessional relationship with a subordinate, Maj. Laural Levine. Holmes denies any impropriety with Levine — with whom he now runs run a strategic communications firm[5] — and says that he needed to occasionally go out of uniform to advise the Afghans without drawing attention to himself. Indeed, Holmes’ evaluation report, which he provided to Danger Room, praised his “capacity, competence and enthusiasm” and recommended him for promotion. But both he and Levine were ultimately reprimanded in what Holmes has called a “kangaroo” proceeding.
And that apparent reprisal is what Holmes wants to impress upon Webster at the Wednesday morning interview. “This is more about shining a light on a pattern of behavior that will do nothing to prevent people like me from saying something is wrong in the future,” Holmes says. “How easy would it be to intimidate a young sergeant, a 20-year old kid? Would he know the illegality, and if he did, [will he report it if] his 25, 30 year old captain screaming in his face, ‘If I say it’s legal, it’s legal’?”
Except there’s another irony there. According to Holmes’ account, the spin job was only an information operations effort because he was asked to participate — in effect, if he was on the other side of the door, it wasn’t a psyop. It’ll be up to Webster to decide if that’s enough to wreck Caldwell’s career.
Photo: Facebook/Michael Holmes