Presidential Race Goes Nuclear
ABC NewsThe leading Democratic candidates for president sparred with each other over the issue of nuclear weapons Thursday and the result was pure heat.
In another broadside indicating the increasingly heated race for the Democratic nomination, Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., implied Thursday that comments made by Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., were careless and unpresidential.
Sen. Clinton was referring to Obama's statement earlier in the day that he had ruled out using nuclear weapons against al Qaeda targets in Afghanistan or Pakistan.
Clinton also suggested Obama's high-profile speech earlier in the week in which he said would be willing to invade Pakistan to attack high-profile al Qaeda targets, given actionable intelligence, was inappropriate, further evidence that she is painting her challenger as unprepared for the job of commander in chief.
Regarding terrorist targets in the Afghanistan/Pakistan region, Obama told The Associated Press Thursday: "I think it would be a profound mistake for us to use nuclear weapons in any circumstance." He then added: "Involving civilians."
Seeming to think twice about his response, Obama then said, "Let me scratch that. There's been no discussion of nuclear weapons. That's not on the table."
Clinton, asked about his remarks Thursday afternoon, took issue with them.
"Presidents should be very careful at all times in discussing the use or nonuse of nuclear weapons," Clinton said. "Presidents since the Cold War have used nuclear deterrence to keep the peace. And I don't believe that any president should make any blanket statements with respect to the use or nonuse of nuclear weapons."
Friday, August 3, 2007
I have to agree with Hillary
More than just saying that I agree that Obama is not ready to be commander-in-chief, I am inclined to agree with Sen. Clinton's stated stances here as she criticizes Sen. Obama. Quite frankly, he's terribly raw when it comes to foreign policy. If he is going to be President some day, he really should get a bit more experience. The same, of course, goes for Sen. Edwards. The problem with Sen. Clinton involves her domestic initiatives and the fact that, while she is saying one thing right now as she's going after Sen. Obama, she would be speaking in a dramatically different manner were her opponent a Republican. The fact that you cannot tell where she stands on topic is really disconcerting to be as a citizen.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment