Is the primary a scam?

I hate when someone from Salon makes a good point, but Michael Shearer is right on with his criticisms of the primary process."

We need a better way to identify candidates that this ridiculous system. Personally, I'm in favor of a direct, representative, nation-wide series of primary elections. Perhaps 3-4 of them would make sense. The first might winnow the field down from the top candidates per political party, then 4, then 2, then you get one. If at any time, someone gets more than 50% of the vote, you can stop. We're basically doing this right now. The only difference is that moving from 10 to 3-4 will occur based on votes in only a small number of voters in a couple of states which are not representative with the rest of the country.

Maybe it's time to sit down, reevaluate how we elect the President, and come up with something a bit more democratic.

The presidential primary scam
Current Opinion - Salon

WASHINGTON -- It's far worse than you think -- worse than the hanging chads, faulty Diebold machines, and billionaires who bankroll last-minute attack ads. The American system for nominating a presidential candidate has about as much in common with actual democracy as Donald Duck has with a lake mallard. It's not just that this year's primaries have been further front-loaded, or that the early primary states aren't representative of the nation at large. There is only passing fairness. There is only the semblance of order. There is nothing like equal representation under the law.

The whole stinking process was designed by dead men in smoky parlors and refined by faceless bureaucrats in hotel conference rooms. It is a nasty brew born of those cauldrons of self-interest known as political parties. At every stage, advantage is parceled out like so much magic potion. "The national interest is not considered in any form," says University of Virginia political scientist Larry Sabato. "Everything is left up to an ad hoc decision. It's chaotic."

This is not an exaggeration. Consider this: If you are a Republican, your vote for the presidential nominee will be worth more in Tennessee than in New York. If you are a Democrat, your vote in the primary will not count in Florida and is unlikely to count in Michigan. If you are a Republican in Wyoming, you probably won't get to vote at all, since only party officials have a say.

And it gets worse. This election cycle, a top Democratic candidate shaking someone's hand in Miami before the end of Florida is breaking the rules, unless that someone is handing the candidate a check at the same time. To put it another way, Democrats' communicating with the voters has been barred in Florida, but taking money from voters is OK. To put it a third way, the system is not only irrational but offensive to the nation's most basic values. "The only way that you can hear a candidates campaign is if you are willing to pay a campaign contribution," explains Steven Geller, Florida's exasperated state Senate Democratic leader. "It is astounding."