Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction

The title to this Salon hit-job really ticks me off. The title, "Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction" conflicts in its entirety with the argument presented in the article: that President Bush was presented with information that said Saddam did not have weapons - some of which, I might add, we have found as well as the knowledge and capability to continue making - but he, and probably the head of the CIA did not believe to be accurate. Believing that the source wasn't to be trusted and, thus, that his assertion that Iraq had no nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons is also not to be trusted is the exact opposite of knowing "Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction." A correct title would be, "Bush trusted wrong CIA sources on Saddam WMD" or "Bush discounted accurate CIA sources on Saddam WMD." The title that was given, however, is ridiculous.

Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction
Sidney Blumenthal for Salon

On Sept. 8, 2002, CIA director George Tenet briefed President Bush in the Oval Office on top-secret intelligence that Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction, according to two former senior CIA officers. Bush dismissed as worthless this information from the Iraqi foreign minister, a member of Saddam's inner circle, although it turned out to be accurate in every detail. Tenet never brought it up again.

Nor was the intelligence included in the National Intelligence Estimate of October 2002, which stated categorically that Iraq possessed WMD. No one in Congress was aware of the secret intelligence that Saddam had no WMD as the house of Representatives and the Senate voted, a week after the submission of the NIE, on the Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq. The information, moreover, was not circulated within the CIA among those agents involved in operations to prove whether Saddam had WMD.

On April 23, 2006, CBS's "60 minutes" interviewed Tyler Drumheller, the former CIA chief of clandestine operations for Europe, who disclosed that the agency had received documentary intelligence from Naji Sabri, Saddam's foreign minister, that Saddam did not have a WMD. "We continued to validate him the whole way through," said Drumheller. "The policy was set. The war in Iraq was coming, and they were looking for intelligence to fit into the policy, to justify the policy."

Now two former senior CIA officers have confirmed Drumheller's account to me and provided the background to the story of how the information that might have stopped the invasion of Iraq was twisted in order to justify it. They described what Tenet said to Bush about the lack of WMD, and how Bush responded, and noted that Tenet never shared Sabri's intelligence with then Secretary of State Colin Powell. According to the former officers, the intelligence was also never shared with the senior military planning the invasion, which required U.S. soldiers to receive medical shots against the ill effects of WMD and to wear protective uniforms in the desert.